Legal Opinion

Erstad v. Curtis Bay Towing Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 27, 1961No. Civ. No. 12153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

In this tort action the deposition of plaintiff upon oral examination was taken at the instance of defendant before a notary-reporter; the testimony has been fully transcribed, but plaintiff has refused to sign the deposition unless and until his counsel has “had an opportunity to review the deposition and to call to his client’s attention any matters which the attorney feels that the client has misunderstood or that the attorney feels was a stenographic error”.

Defendant contends that plaintiff’s attorney has no right to review the deposition and to suggest changes in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colin v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  2. De Seversky v. Republic Aviation Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lugtig v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  2. In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contracts Litigation. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Robert W. Adams and Western Nuclear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. Sanford v. CBS, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  4. Valley National Bank v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Willco Kuwait (Trading) SAK v. DeSavaryDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API