Legal Opinion
Lawrence Bonaduce v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1998No. 96-36301UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
141 F.3d 1174
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
LAWRENCE BONADUCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-36301.
DC No. CV 96-411 ALH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 6, 1998.**
Decided March 16, 1998.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Clancy v. Bay Area BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lane County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shaw v. R.U. One Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011