Rayburn v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Certiorari was granted to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
The facts are briefly stated in the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Petitioner asserts that he is being held under an extradition warrant illegally because the supporting papers do not meet the requirements of the law. The Court of Criminal Appeals found that the supporting papers were sufficient, and we agree.
Petitioner's sole contention on certiorari is that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in taking "judicial notice" that the laws of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Goodman v. Director of Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- In Re GrazianiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.