Colt Industries v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Colt Industries (employer) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision that Robert V. Eardley (claimant) was eligible to receive compensation under Sections 108 (k) and 108 (n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (k) and (n), because he was disabled by an occupational disease.
Prom April 14, 1968 through March 24, 1976 the employer employed claimant in the hot strip mill as a crane…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Hazleton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Locastro v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Liberty Baking Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cesare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Reed v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.