Legal Opinion

Colt Industries v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1980No. Appeal, No. 504 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Colt Industries (employer) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision that Robert V. Eardley (claimant) was eligible to receive compensation under Sections 108 (k) and 108 (n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (k) and (n), because he was disabled by an occupational disease.

Prom April 14, 1968 through March 24, 1976 the employer employed claimant in the hot strip mill as a crane…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Hazleton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Locastro v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Liberty Baking Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Cesare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Reed v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API