Legal Opinion

Alter v. Shearwood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1926No. 19413PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Plaintiff in error first attempted to invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court by filing his motion to certify the record under the provisions of Section 2, Article IV, of the Ohio Constitution. This court overruled the motion to certify, but on the same day he filed his petition in error as a matter of right, claiming that he had a case “involving questions arising under the Constitution of the United States or of this state.”

In order to understand the basis of plaintiff in error’s claim, a brief history may be necessary. Plaintiff below, a minor, had filed his petition asking for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Chitty v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  5. T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. SyfanTexas Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Chester Park Co. v. SchulteOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Larrissey v. Norwalk Truck Lines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Doyle v. Fairfield Machine Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API