Legal Opinion

State v. Brookhouse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1894No. 1252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Douglas County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The prosecution of the appellant was based upon an information containing the following charge :

“The said John Brookhouse, at the county and state aforesaid, on, to-wit: the 28th day of June, 1893, did then and there feloniously take, steal, drive or lead away, twenty-five head of cattle, being then and there the property of E5. D. Nash, and being then and there of the value of seven hundred dollars.”

The theory of the state was that this was a charge of grand larceny under Penal Code, § 48, and the jury was so instructed by the court. We do…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. State v. HambletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. State v. LawnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. United States v. MattockDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1872
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. BrubakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MatejouskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. CollettIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. MajorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Esser v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of NyeNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Commonwealth v. CornellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API