Legal Opinion

Rennick v. Rumsey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 5, 1815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION of the Court, by

Cb.Bovxe.

Rum-sey being indebted to Rcnnick and others, citizens! of Virginia, conveyed a tract of land lying in Mnn« roe coimty 0f that state, to trustees, who are; also citi-zens of that state, for the purpose of securing the pay-ment of those, debts.. The debts thus secured not being paj¿ aj- time appointed in the deed of trust, the land sold at public auction at Greenbriar court house, and Rcnnick became the purchaser; at a very inade-qUate price, and for much less thanwassuificient to sa-tisfJ t5ic ⅛!⅛;- For the balance due to Rennick, he assigned Rumscy’s…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. AlbrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Walker v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Burchett v. BlackburneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Jones v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Head's rep's v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API