Philadelphia v. Allen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 157, Oct. T., 1901, by James D. Scott, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1877, No. 172, M. L. D., discharging rule to open judgment in case of City of Philadelphia v. Clayton Allen. Rule to open judgment entered on a tax lien. Error assigned was order discharging rule.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
This case presents the same questions which were involved-in Philadelphia v. Unknown Owner, in which an opinion has this day been filed. The property assessed was described in the same manner as in the other case, but the owner is in the present proceeding designated as Clayton Allen and the record *210shows that the original scire facias was served upon the person so designated as owner, in the manner required in serving a summons. We have here therefore a record which shows a service upon the person who was assessed as owner. The taxes were for the years 1872, 1873…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Philadelphia v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- City of Philadelphia v. BrowningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Philadelphia v. ReevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Philadelphia v. ReaderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906