Adams v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This proceeding was begun by a writ of habeas corpus. The same proceeding was conducted for two parties, separately, but they have been consolidated and the same status exists as to them both, so what is here said applies to both.
The return to the writ of habeas corpus shows that the petitioner was held under a warrant issued by the Governor of this State upon a requisition of the Governor of the State of Illinois. The Governor’s warrant is conceded by petitioner’s counsel to contain the jurisdictional facts necessary to the issuance thereof. Russell v. State, 251 Ala. 268, 37…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Doe ex dem. Hughes v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Baird Lumber Co. v. DevlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Tingley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Austin v. Tennessee Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Harrison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Gambrell v. BridgesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Bearden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.