Legal Opinion

In re Sussman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 30, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This Court has before it the petition of one Morris Klein to review an order made by the Referee in Bankruptcy expunging his amended proof of claim. The petitioner contends that his claim in the sum of $84,-414.23 is a provable claim under the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., that the claim had been proven, and, therefore, should not have been disallowed.

The controversy in this case arises from the filing of an amended proof of claim by the said Klein based on “implied contract” on the part of the bankrupt to repay money which Klein advanced to one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. In Re BarryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  3. In re EckDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944
  4. In re Louis Hookerman, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  5. In re SeldonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Nine Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Copeland v. Emroy Investors, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API