Legal Opinion

Boyle v. New York & New England Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action for causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The case was tried by the judge below without a jury. He found the facts specially, and ruled that upon them the plaintiff was not entitled to maintain her action. If this ruling was correct, it is unnecessary to consider whether the rulings asked for the plaintiff were correct or not. The facts, briefly stated, were that the plaintiff’s intestate was conductor of a switching crew in the defendant’s yard; having charge of all movements of cars within or about the yard; and that while he was acting as such on May 18, 1886,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mellor v. Merchants' Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Lothrop v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Clifford v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Yeaton v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Hodgkins v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miner v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Mahoney v. DoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Tucker v. Northern Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Anderson v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Connors v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API