Scott v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Chief Justice.
By a letter signed by the attorneys for all the parties, the court is advised that since the submission of the case the parties “have compromised their differences with the understanding however that if possible the decision of the court on the questions involved should not be interrupted.” It is said that a decision of some of the questions raised by the petition in error would be important on matters continuously arising in the various district courts, but it is not intimated that a decision would affect the rights of the parties under their compromise. The letter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wedekind v. BellNevada Supreme Court · 1902
- General Petroleum Corp. v. BeilbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Schlanbusch v. SchlanbuschNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northern Utilities, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Scott v. WardWyoming Supreme Court · 1936