Legal Opinion

Saffell v. Wash

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 18, 1843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Anderson Circuit. Replevin. Exempted property.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action of replevin was brought by Wash against Saffell for taking a horse of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded, that he, as Constable, having in his bands an execution from a Justice of the Peace against Wash, levied it, while in full force, on the horse, being the property of the plaintiff, and prays a return. To this the *93plaintiff replied, that the horse was his only work beast, which upon facts stated, he claimed to be exempt by law from execution. The defendant rejoined, denying the exemption, and issue having been taken thereon,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  2. Butts v. WoodsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API