Legal Opinion · Dissent

Altemus v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1996Published

1DissentFriedman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Because I do not believe that Gary K. Altemus’s (Claimant) DUI convictions constitute willful misconduct connected with his work under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),11 would reverse.

The Majority, in reaching a contrary result, states that the record contains substantial evidence to support the UCBR’s conclusion “that Claimant’s misconduct both at school and off duty was willful and that it directly affected his ability to teach in the public schools.” (Majority op. at 870) (Emphasis added.) However, the UCBR did not draw such a conclusion;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DerkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Reitmeyer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API