Application of Arthur Sinclair Taylor
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The sole issue 1 here is whether the rejection of claim 1 of the application on appeal 2 is proper. The rejection is for double patenting and is predicated on the claims of appellant’s prior patent. 3 The application on appeal is a continuation-in-part of the application on which appellant’s prior patent was issued.
The appealed application and the patent are each concerned with a film of collagen which may be slit into ribbons. Collagen is a protein found in, e. g., intestines and tendons of animals. Collagen had been fluidized and cast into ribbons prior to appellant’s invention…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Douglas J. BridgefordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of Norman B. ChristensenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Northern Petrochemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Application of Francis J. BoylanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- General Foods Corporation v. Carnation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.