Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Clemente

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding that claimant willfully made a false statement to obtain benefits and imposing a forfeiture of 24 effective days (Labor Law, § 594). “ Section 594 does not require a criminal intent or proof sufficient to support larceny” (Matter of Bernstein [Corsi], 278 App. Div. 625, affd. 303 N. Y. 755). Furthermore, “ Whether the necessary ‘element of scienter and knowledge of falsity or wrongfulness ’ is present in a given ease is a question of fact and therefore is for the board to determine.” (Matter of Soroka…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BernsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. In re the Claim of BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of WeitzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API