United States v. Freddie Dale Barnhill
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Freddie Dale Barnhill appeals his jury-trial conviction for violation of the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312), transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate commerce. He raises two issues: that Nebraska Highway Patrol officers obtained his confession after violating the rule of Miranda 1 by pressing an interrogation upon him against his wishes, and that the prosecution failed to prove the voluntariness of his confession introduced at trial after a Jackson v. Denno 2 hearing. We reject these contentions and affirm the conviction.
The substantive facts disclose that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Klingler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Donald Roy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Tasby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Walter J. Entrekin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- State v. RussoNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnnie Tasby v. United States of America, Booker T. Burkhalter v. United States of America, Joe Willie Feggett v. United States of America, Paul Lawrence Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.