Legal Opinion

Higdon v. City of Senoia

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2000No. S00A1103, S00A1104PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

In these companion cases we are called upon to resolve whether OCGA §§ 36-70-24 (4) (C) and 36-36-11 violate the delegation of zoning power under Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. IV of the Georgia Constitution. For the reasons which follow, we declare the statutes constitutional, and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In its 1997 session, the General Assembly enacted the Service Delivery Act, OCGA § 36-70-20 et seq., to “minimize inefficiencies resulting from duplication of services and competition between local governments and to provide a mechanism to resolve disputes over…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baker v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. City of BremenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. City of Nashville v. SnowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Dallas Blue Haven Pools, Inc. v. TaslimiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Georgia Transmission Corp. v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Singletary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. DeKalb County School District v. GoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API