Legal Opinion
Claim of Fine v. S.M.C. Microsystems Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1989Published
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 16, 1987.
Seymour Fine was employed as an engineer lab technician by S.M.C. Microsystems Corporation. Fine’s duties consisted of assisting engineers by drawing up schematics, operating a tester to debug designs and ordering needed parts and components. Although his basic hours were from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Fine was given the discretion to put in whatever overtime was necessary to complete his work, including working on weekends. Although the great majority of Fine’s duties required the use of specialized equipment located…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of De Voe v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greene v. NYC SOC SERVS.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Claim of Hille v. Gerald RecordsNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Claim of Trent v. Collins Tuttle & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Claim of Tiernan v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.