Legal Opinion

Difrancesco v. Moomjian

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

This litigation arose from a claim made by the plaintiff for money alleged to be due him for work and materials furnished and expenditures made in the erection of certain buildings and incidental work under a written contract. This contract provided that the plaintiff Construction Company, for the consideration of $15,000, would build and erect five stores and a garage on land belonging to the defendant Mary H. Moomjian at the corner of Whitney and Central avenues in Hamden, except plumbing and tinning, and also to build a wall in the rear. It was further agreed by that contract that certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liefeld v. CoffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Patterson v. KelloggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Gray's Appeal From Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  4. Perkins v. Town of ColebrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Scutt v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. M. Rosa Construction Co. v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API