State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Defendant appeals from two convictions for robbery in the first degree. He assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to suppress eyewitness identification evidence. We affirm.
During the evening of April 6, 1981, defendant and another man robbed a southeast Portland drug store of drugs and money. The owner of the pharmacy and a clerk were working at the time. They contacted the police and furnished descriptions of both robbers. On the basis of those descriptions sent out by the police dispatcher, an officer went to an address where he had been told that two persons who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. PonceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. LowtherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HarmsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LamperUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Red Flame, Inc. v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.