Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and new trial granted. Memorandum: The trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury that a violation of *938the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (see, 9 NYCRR part 600 et seq.), adopted by the City of Rochester (see, City of Rochester Code § 39-101), could be considered as evidence of negligence (see, Major v Waverly & Ogden, 7 NY2d 332, 336). The evidence was sufficient to support a finding by the jury that defendant violated the Code and that the violation was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries. Therefore, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Major v. Waverly & Ogden, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Heil v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Lein v. CzaplinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enrichment Enterprises, Inc. v. Jempris Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API