Sullins v. American Medical Response of Oklahoma, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceOpala, J.
11 The court holds today that a private entity is not a public trust's "agency" within the meaning of the Governmental Tort Claims Act merely because it is contractually obligated to a public trust to provide the latter with services. I concur in the court's bottom-line answer but not in its pronouncement. The determinative issue here is whether the defendant American Medical Response of Oklahoma, Inc. [AMR] may *265claim implied immunity from tort liability as a municipal ageney. Just as the court does today, I would also answer in the negative. My bottom line is that EMSA (a public trust) lacks…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.