Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Crenshaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2006No. 129317Published

1Opinion of the Court

710 N.W.2d 260 (2006)

474 Mich. 1024

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

v.

Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and

Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Docket No. 129317. COA No. 260219.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. TyrpinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005