Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hertz Corp. v. Ashbaugh

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1980No. 3987Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I specially concur.

Foundation Reserve says:

[T]he only issue before this Court is an issue of law, namely, whether the 1972 Ford pick-up, not described under the policy, but owned by Ashbaugh, was a “non-owned” vehicle because of the policy having been issued to Ashbaugh in the name of “Tilman H. Ashbaugh, d/b/a Corky’s Wrecker Service.” * * *

The 1972 Ford was not a pick-up. It was a half-ton truck with a flat bed.

The answer to the issue is: The 1972 Ford half-ton pick-up was a “non-owned” vehicle because Foundation Reserve foisted upon “Corky’s Wrecker Service” a “Basic…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sandoval v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Read v. Western Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API