Legal Opinion
Harper v. Continental Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1986No. 84-2591PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Continental Oil Company (Conoco), in a quiet title action removed on diversity grounds to federal court. Conoco owned an oil and gas lease on a 160-acre tract in Kansas. Cono-co drilled several producing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schraft v. LeisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Nina N. Dodge, Also Known as Nina N. (Dodge) Cullinan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. KesslerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Armbruster v. Thetis Energy Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- O.G. Harper v. Continental Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mid-Continent Lodging Associates, Inc. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998