Smith v. Groneweg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hides, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
Certain depositions on the part of the defendants were taken under the notice authorized by Gen. St. 1878, c. 73, § 36. They were only received and filed the day before the trial, and the appellant was entitled to raise any objection to them which might have been urged upon a motion to suppress. When the depositions in question were offered in evidence on the trial of this case, the plaintiff moved to suppress them on the ground that they were not properly attested by the witnesses. ' Each witness was cross-examined by the plaintiff’s attorney. The testimony of each was written upon two or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kimball & Rowe v. Davis & BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Chadwick v. ChadwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Semmens v. WaltersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Goodyear v. VosburghNew York Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rock Island Plow Co. v. SchoeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Wolfson v. KohnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941