Legal Opinion
Norton v. Knapp
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 10, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court. Action to recover for property sold and delivered, and on an accepted draft. Judgment for tbe defendant, and the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
• Seevers, J.
i. draet: aeceptance oí: wiiat does and does not Because of the statements contained in an amended abstract, we are required to set out the petition, as ÍOliOWS: x
That the plaintiffs sold and delivered to the defendant, about February 17, 1882, a certain flaxseed-cleaner mill, at the agreed price of eighty dollars, no part of which had been paid, and that the same was then due.
That on or about April, 1882, plaintiffs drew a sight draft on defendant for the agreed price of said mill, whicli was in words and figures as follows:
“$80. La Cross, Wis., April 18, 1882.
“At sight pay to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Liken v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
- Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Brown v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Tyler v. CoulthardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895