Legal Opinion
Hiram H. Hoelzer v. The City of Stamford, Connecticut
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 13, 1992No. 1615, Docket 92-7186PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
The City of Stamford, Connecticut, appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Louis L. Stanton, Judge, awarding Hiram Hoelzer $557,200 as quantum me-ruit compensation for art restoration services he performed on six murals belonging to the City, in the belief that they belonged to him. In this action to quiet title in October 1989, Judge Stanton entered partial judgment holding that title to the murals rested in the City. We affirmed and remanded the case for trial to determine whether Hoelzer was entitled to any compensation.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edward M. Goldberg, M.D., Cross-Appellant v. Medtronic, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hiram H. Hoelzer v. The City of Stamford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Alden Auto Parts Warehouse, Inc. v. Dolphin Equipment Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Republic Insurance v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994