Legal Opinion

Dubuque & Sioux City Railway Co. v. Cedar Falls & Minnesota Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from, Dubuque District Court. — Hon. J. J. Ney, Judge. This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate a temporary injunction. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

— In 1866, the plaintiff owned and was engaged in operating a line of railroad from Dubuque to Cedar Palls. By its articles of incorporation it was empowered to build its railway westward to the Missouri river. Defendant also owned a line of road extending from a point on plaintiff’s road to Waverley, a distance of fourteen miles, and by its articles was empowered to extend the same to the north line of the state. On the twenty-seventh of September of that year, the parties executed a contract by which defendant leased its road to plaintiff for the term of forty years from January 1, 1867. By…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  2. Stewart v. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Home Savings & Trust Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Security Savings Bank v. CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Smith v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Des Moines City Railway Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API