Legal Opinion

Claim of Church v. Mittelstaedt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by uninsured employers. Employee was hired as a handy-man by the sisters Harriet and Emma Mittelstaedt, who owned and operated *905a building No. 86 University place, New York city, where he did general janitor work. It was occupied by tenants and by the employers. Until a brief period before the injury, Harriet conducted a store whereat antiques were sold, at No. 86. This business was moved to No. 84, of the same street, and claimant continued to act as janitor there. The award was properly made against both employers. If the employment at 84 was rendered to Harriet alone, she was a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Quirk v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Dennison v. Peckham Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API