Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chaves v. Kroger, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1994No. A94A0088Published

1DissentAndrews, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. The trial court’s grant of summary judgment was proper for two reasons.

First, the evidence here established that Kroger had complied with its duty to Chaves. In support of its motion for summary judgment, Kroger submitted the affidavit of a clerk, Larry Dewberry, in which he stated that he observed another Kroger clerk sweeping the area in which the fall occurred minutes before Chaves fell. After the aisle was swept and about two minutes before the fall, Dewberry checked the aisle to make sure that there were no foreign substances on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Minor v. Super Discount Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Smith v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Wiley v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API