Legal Opinion

Knollman Lumber Co. v. Hillenbrand

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

These appeals on questions of law present a controversy between the owners, a mortgagee, and various materialmen, arising out of the construction of a residence.

The owners (Lanes) entered into a contract with one Hillenbrand, whereby in consideration of the construction of the residence by Hillenbrand the owners agreed to pay $6,775, upon the following terms:

“Six hundred dollars ($600) with the signing of this contract, and an additional one hundred seventy-five dollars ($175) within 60 days from the deed of this contract and a construction loan from the liberal association which has been…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. YarboroughOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. APCO Industries, Inc. v. Braun Constr. Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Michael J. Baumann & Co. v. Qualstan Corp. (In Re Qualstan Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Ford Homes, Inc. v. Bobie, Ca2008-09-220 (2-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hillsdale Loan & Bldg. Co. v. CreagerClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API