Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile v. McCarthy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 1995No. 94-3765PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In Warren v. Travelers Insurance Co., 650 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), we rejected substantially the same argument appellant presents here. Therefore, we affirm on the authority of Warren, and, as we did in Warren, certify the following question of great public importance:

MAY AN INJURED PERSON WHO IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER BODILY INJURY LIABILITY BENEFITS, BUT WHOSE DAMAGES EXCEED THE POLICY LIMIT FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE, ALSO RECOVER UNDER THE SAME POLICY FOR UNINSURED MOTORIST BENEFITS, WHERE THE POLICY EXCLUDES THE INSURED VEHICLE FROM ITS DEFINITION OF “UNINSURED VEHICLE”?

In addition, we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bulone v. United Services Auto. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Warren v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API