Legal Opinion

Gaudoz v. Blanque

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1871No. 2359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from thp Seventh District Court, parish of Orleans.

1Opinion of the CourtLudeling, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The only question for decision is, was there sufficient authentic evidence to authorize the fiat? We think not. The act of mortgage and notes purport to be executed by Charles de Hault de Lassus as-agent of Miss Blanque. There is no proof of this agency in the record'. 12 R. 238, Dosson, curator v. Sanders; 1 R. 407; 2 An. 491.

It is therefore adjudged that the order of seizure and sale be annulled, and that the appellee pay costs of this appeal.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barton v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tapp v. Guaranty Finance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. MonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Bank of Leesville v. WingateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  4. General Finance Co. of Louisiana v. EvansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Holliday v. LoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API