Legal Opinion
Linscomb v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 11, 1992No. 203-91Published
1Opinion of the Court
829 S.W.2d 164 (1992)
Robert Earl LINSCOMB, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 203-91.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
March 11, 1992.
Rehearing Denied May 6, 1992.
Bob Wicoff, Houston, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Alan Curry, Denise Dryer, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Before the Court en banc.
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BENAVIDES, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivering cocaine in violation of the Texas Controlled Substances Act.[1] His punishment, enhanced by two prior…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.