Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crees v. Chiles

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided January 4, 1989No. 88-69Published

1DissentDonielson, Judge

I believe that Richard L. Heideman is immune from suit by his employee. This result does not require a legislative act but results from interpretation of the existing statute.

Iowa Code section 85.61 defines the terms employer and worker for purposes of Chapters 85, 86, and 87. The statute expressly states: “unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions of terms shall prevail ...”

Because there are many possible combinations of titles one may possess in a small business, the statute allows the court to interpret the context of a situation to determine whether an individual is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pappas v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API