Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1988No. 16901Published

1ConcurrenceBakes, Justice

The Court’s opinion, which I join, correctly points out that at the summary judgment stage, “The motion should be denied if conflicting inferences could have been drawn from the facts alleged in the affidavits, and if reasonable people might have reached different conclusions as to whether the city was willful and wanton.” That determination requires an evaluation of the evidence in the record, based upon the law applicable to the city’s conduct, i.e., the city’s alleged willful and wanton misconduct. As expressed in IDJI No. 225, willful and wanton misconduct is defined as:

“Willful and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russ Ballard & Family Achievement Institute v. Lava Hot Springs Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Harvey v. F-B Truck Line Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. BarnettIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API