Norum v. Ohio Oil Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
After motion for rehearing had been made and filed in this case, Messrs. Belden & DeKalb appeared and asked leave to file a brief in support of the motion as amici curiae, which was accorded them. They presented and argued the.question of whether the doctrine of account stated is properly applicable to a mistake of law in interpreting the provisions of a contract in writing, by which the rights of the parties are established. In consequence whereof, a rehearing was granted, and the appeal was re-argued by all counsel, solely as to the correctness of our original views expressed…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Chappedelaine v. DechenauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Power & Bro., Ltd. v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.