Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Redeker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1889No. 2653PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Beckham. This is a second appeal. The first is reported in 67 Texas, 190. The opinion and the report give a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

This action was brought by the appellee Louis Redeker for loss of services of his minor son J. W. Redeker, expenses, etc., resulting from an injury received while the minor was engaged as an employe of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company on a construction train in the capacity of a brakeman.

On the former appeal of the case the court, Mr. Justice Gaines delivering the opinion, laid down the following propositions of law: He said, “There can be no question that if the injury was the result of negligence, as alleged in the petition, the father was entitled to a judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. LevertonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Thomas v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Fullerton v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Cheek v. BellowsTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Woolfolk v. RicketsTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lasater v. JamisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. CurlSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Fermier v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Huntsville Knitting Mill Co. v. ButnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Taylor v. Chesapeake & O. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API