Hernandez v. Ten Ten Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered October 14, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted Prudential’s motion and Schmergel Construction’s cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6), unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion and cross motion as to the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and reinstate the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action, the third-party complaint and all cross claims and counterclaims sounding in common-law indemnification or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Prats v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Griffin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hernadez v. Ten Ten Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006