Legal Opinion

United States v. Heidi Tirado

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2017No. 15-50316Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Heidi Tirado (“Appellant”) appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting the government’s motion for forfeiture of Pedro Alejandro Tirado’s $50,000 appearance bond and entering judgment against Appellant as surety for the full amount of the bond. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Appellant contends that the district court erred by entering a $50,000 judgment against her as surety. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to set aside the bond forfeiture. See United States v. Nguyen, 279 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir. 2002).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Sureties Tracy Nguyen Khanh Bui, Claimants-Appellants v. Vinh Huu NguyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Noriega-SarabiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API