Legal Opinion

Montana Horner v. United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1989No. 87-2989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Montana Horner appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Horner seeks reversal on the following grounds:

One.. The Parole Commission improperly denied him early termination of his parole in violation of 28 C.F.R. § 2.43(e), after he had completed three years without any adverse report concerning his behavior.

Two. His waiver of his right to counsel at the parole revocation hearing was invalid because it was the product of coercion and misrepresentation.

Three. He was denied access to adverse information in violation of 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Thomas M. Roth v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Coleman v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Badea v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Montana Horner v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API