Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Sullivan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1946No. 36047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'L. A. Smith, Sr., J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellee-filed his original bill in the Chancery Court of Franklin County against several defendants, including Joe Dorsey. No process was ever;served on some of the defendants, and the process on others was defective. We cite only one instance: “The heirs of Clabe Dorsey who are unknown to your complainant,” and the record does not show that they ever appeared, nor Was the bill dismissed as to them. ■ However, process was validly served on some others of the defendants.

The suit involved 808 acres, more or less, in Franklin County,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalton v. Rhodes Motor Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bank of Philadelphia v. PoseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hancock v. ReedyMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kelly v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hunt v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Khoury v. SaikMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  2. White v. MERCHANTS AND PLANTERS BK.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Garrett v. BohannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Robbins v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  5. MOORE v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API