Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2016No. 91742-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

This ,pinion was file~ for record at · 00 OJV\ on Q~ 5 1 l.AJI_ (p . Oak-d~ ,__~ ~· Suprem7court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON GEORGIANA ARNOLD, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 91742-6 ) v. ) ENBANC ) CITY OF SEATTLE, d/b/a HUMAN ) SERVICES DEPARTMENT, ) ) Petitioner. ) Filed MAY 0 5 2016 _________________________) FAIRHURST, J.-RCW 49.48.030 provides that employees are entitled to reasonable attorney fees from their employer or former employer "[i]n any action in which any person is successful in recovering judgment for wages or salary owed to him or her." This case concerns…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API