Legal Opinion

Curry v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1915No. 494Published

Appeal from District Court, Midland County; S. J. Tsaacks, Judge. Action by A. F. Curry against Elmer Marshall. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

[1] Curry brought this suit in trespass to try title to recover section 46 in block 39, township 4 south, Texas & Pacific Railway Company original grantee, situate in Midland County. The case was tried before the court upon an agreed statement of facts. The agreed facts were embodied in findings of fact filed by the trial court. From same it appears that the facts material to a consideration of the questions presented are as follows:

On July 27, 1901, the land in controversy was duly classified as grazing land, and ap praised at $2 per acre by the Commissionej of the General Land Office, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Adams v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Erp v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ford v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Boswell v. Terrell, CommissionerTexas Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API