Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bicknell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The plaintiff and the testator Aril A. Wetherbee entered into a paroi agreement of partnership in August, 1894, which having been dissolved by his death February 11, 1919, this suit is for an accounting during the entire period, and a final settlement of the affairs of the firm. The plaintiff, a printer by trade, having established a small general jobbing business, agreed *354with Wetherbee, his brother-in-law, that a partnership should be formed, the capital to consist of the plaintiff’s machinery and stock in trade at a valuation of $2,495.71, while Wetherbee was to contribute $1,000 in cash,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Halstead v. GrinnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hawkes v. LackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. McIntire v. PryorSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Danforth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Einsweiler v. EinsweilerIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wellman v. NorthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Brigham v. BicknellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Cohen v. MarandolaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API