Legal Opinion
Miller v. Miller
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 21, 2012No. 4D10-5138PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMay, C.J.
The former wife appeals from an attorney’s fees award to the former husband. She provides seven reasons why we should reverse the order. We find merit in the first issue, in which she argues the trial court erred in awarding fees for the former husband’s Petition for Modification based on the prevailing party fee provision in the marital settlement agreement1 (“MSA”). We agree and reverse.
The Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage incorporated the MSA, which contained the following provision:
ENFORCEMENT: If any subsequent proceedings to enforce any provisions of the Agreement are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trytek v. Gale Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Reilly v. ReillyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Franzen v. Lacuna Golf Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- 22ND Century Properties, LLC and David F. Damerau v. FPH Properties, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Quarles & Brady, LLC, Quarles & Brady, LLP and Richard HornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Chastain v. ChastainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Citrix Systems, Inc. v. Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.