Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Schofield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1961No. 21133Published

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

The order under review is one sustaining the general demurrer and three special demurrers to a petition seeking to require, by writ of mandamus absolute, the defendant, in his official capacity as Chief Plumbing Inspector of the City of Atlanta, to- register the plaintiff as a plumbing contractor.

■The petition is in two counts. Count 1 as originally brought alleged: Under the ordinances of the City of Atlanta, before one could engage in the business of a contracting plumber in the city, *590he had to register with the defendant, the Chief Plumbing Inspector and have a certificate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  2. Ficklen v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Ficklen v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Dunn v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API