Legal Opinion

Tendoy Area Council v. State, Department of Employment

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1985No. 15616Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

“Substantial and competent evidence” apparently depends upon whether you are a claimant or an employer. In the past 32 years, this Court has decided 22 cases involving the exact issue before us today— whether substantial and competent evidence exists to support the Industrial Commission’s conclusion that a claimant either had or did not have good cause to leave his or her job. Of those 22 cases, only twice has this Court held that a claimant has had good cause for quitting; including today’s case, this Court has held 21 out of 23 times that a claimant has not had good cause for quitting. See…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Burroughs v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Guillard v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Smith v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rogers v. Trim HouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API